Riverhead Town's contract with Riverhead Resorts, the company that sought to build a complex bigger than Disneyland on town-owned property in Calverton, is off.
The Riverhead Town Board voted 4-1 to terminate the $155 million agreement Friday morning with Councilman John Dunleavy casting the sole dissenting vote.
Mr. Dunleavy said the $7.5 million Riverhead Resorts has already made in non-refundable
payments to the town have helped keep the tax rate down. He also said it
was wrong to terminate the contract before Tuesday, the date the board
gave Resorts to make a $3.9 million payment for two contract extension
payments it owed dating back to May 15.
But Riverhead Resorts president John Niven said after Friday's vote that he still intends to
wire the money to the town either late Friday or Monday and that he
hopes town officials will change their mind once they get the money.
"We're still committed to building this project," he said.
Mr. Walter said the only way he'd consider changing his vote is if the group wired the entire $100 million into the town's account Monday.
"If they can't come up with $3.9 million, how are they going to convince us they can come up with $100 million," he said.
The project, which was expected to cost $1 billion to build, called for eight themed resorts including an indoor ski mountain.
"Finally, we have got the 800 pound gorilla off our back," said Councilman George
Garbrielsen. He said the town can now subdivide the property and market
it properly.
Mr. Walter said he opposed terminating the contract earlier because he felt the payments might help the town avoid layoffs.
"That brings us to today," he said in a written statement. "It is clear to
this member of the Town Board that Riverhead Resorts cannot close their
transaction with Riverhead. Months of excuses, platitudes, apologies,
justifications, and explanations have only left Riverhead holding the
bag at EPCAL and this cannot continue."
Councilman Jim Wooten, who has opposed terminating the contract in prior votes, said he voted for
it today because he feels Resorts and other developers still will be
able to make a proposal for the property in the future, although he said
he thinks it will probably be for less money.
Comment
Comment by Jen on June 7, 2011 at 8:39am 154 members
282 members
168 members
16 members
36 members
© 2012 Created by Ignition Nation, Inc..
You need to be a member of Ignition Nation to add comments!
Join Ignition Nation